Chapter 28: Communicating with Decision Makers: Getting the Board on Board

by Nigel Heaton and Bernie Catterall

Practitioner summary

Human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) practitioners have the best opportunity ever to communicate with senior decision makers to get our message to the Boards of companies, but we need to adapt our approach to their needs. For instance, the emphasis on risk and risk management within corporations gives us an ideal tool to talk to the senior executive. We must become expert at talking to the Board in language that they use and are familiar with. As organisations are driven by measureable objectives we need to align our message to these objectives and demonstrate how the HF/E practitioner contributes to the solution. A simple framework that allows organisations to explore their vision, their core values and the effectiveness of their risk registers provides us with a start-point to work with the senior team to demonstrate how they can articulate what really matters and begin to deliver improvements.


Chapter quotes

“In our experience of Boards and senior management, we have used HF/E to argue the case for health and safety. Health and safety is just one goal of HF/E, but it is an important function and department for our customers, in a way that HF/E is not.”

“A typical communication method for health and safety practitioners tends to concern injuries and associated costs. This casts the practitioner in terms of an overhead cost. As HF/E practitioners, we can instead use HF/E interventions before people become harmed. In these cases we find that simple footage of jobs before and after intervention and tools that report on MSD symptoms before and after interventions alongside statements from end users can support a powerful message that HF/E interventions improve human work and increase output – safely.”

“We also need an understanding of how quality goals, and especially performance targets, impact human performance in a non-production environment. In one reported case… teachers were required to hit high pass rates for their students. This goal encouraged teachers to cheat to meet the highest quality goals… As HF/E practitioners, we can look at the wider systems implications of quality goals and targets. We need to help the senior leadership teams understand how simple quality targets can distort the system and generate unexpected side-effects in the way that people behave”

“Our abilities to understand systems, people and work give us a unique insight into how organisations can get better.”

Practitioner reflections

Advertisements

About stevenshorrock

I am a systems ergonomist/human factors specialist and work psychologist with a background in practice and research in safety-critical industries. My main interest is human and system behaviour in the context of safety-related organisations. I seek to enable improvement via a combination of systems thinking, design thinking and humanistic thinking. I am a Chartered Ergonomist and Human Factors Specialist with the CIEHF and a Chartered Psychologist with the British Psychological Society. I currently work as a human factors and safety specialist in air traffic control in Europe. I am also Adjunct Associate Professor at University of the Sunshine Coast, Centre for Human Factors & Sociotechnical Systems. I blog in a personal capacity. Views expressed here are mine and not those of any affiliated organisation, unless stated otherwise. You can find me on twitter at @stevenshorrock
This entry was posted in Part 4: Communicating about Human Factors and Ergonomics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s